
As the national debate over gun violence intensifies, state lawmakers are increasingly targeting “machine gun conversion” devices — small, illegal components that can transform a semi-automatic firearm into a fully automatic weapon capable of firing dozens of rounds per second.
Known on the streets and online as “Glock switches” or “auto sears,” these devices have become a growing concern for law enforcement and federal agencies alike. Their rise has prompted a wave of new state-level legislation aimed at closing loopholes that allow such components to be purchased or manufactured — often using 3D printers or imported parts.
What These Devices Do
A “Glock switch” is no larger than a coin, yet when attached to a handgun, it converts the weapon into a fully automatic machine gun. Under federal law, these devices are already classified as machine guns, making their possession or use a serious felony.

But the surge in online sales, 3D-printed replicas, and social media tutorials has made enforcement difficult. As a result, several U.S. states are stepping in to strengthen penalties, ban possession outright, and create state-level task forces to track and seize illegal conversion parts.
Recent State Actions
- Illinois, Minnesota, and Colorado have recently passed laws mirroring federal restrictions, increasing penalties for possession or distribution.
- California and New York have gone further — treating even 3D files or digital blueprints for switches as contraband.
- Texas and Florida, while maintaining strong Second Amendment protections, are exploring specific penalties for unregistered modifications, balancing enforcement with political caution.
In short, states are not waiting for Washington — they’re drafting their own playbooks to handle a problem that’s spreading faster than federal agencies can respond.
Law Enforcement’s Growing Challenge
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has reported a dramatic rise in crimes involving conversion devices, including their use in drive-by shootings and gang-related violence. What’s alarming is their accessibility — many are sold online for under $50 or shared as printable files.

State officials say local enforcement is crucial. Federal prosecutions are limited in scope, and state-level laws allow police to act before federal agencies intervene, especially in cases where modified weapons appear during routine arrests.
The Bigger Legal Picture
The emerging state-level response reveals a growing patchwork of firearm regulation across the country — one that could lead to future circuit splits or Supreme Court challenges.
At the heart of the issue lies a constitutional tension: Where does the right to bear arms end and public safety begin in an era when a single device can change the nature of a weapon entirely?
States see these bans not as anti-gun measures, but as anti-modification controls, designed to stop rapid-fire conversions that blur the line between legal and lethal.
In Summary
The crackdown on Glock switches and similar devices reflects a broader trend toward proactive firearm regulation at the state level. It’s a reminder that while the Second Amendment remains fiercely debated, the technology transforming firearms is evolving faster than the law — and lawmakers are racing to keep up.